Griffin
(2009) defined genderlect as “a term suggesting that masculine and feminine
styles of discourse are best viewed as two distinct cultural dialects” (p.
430). Tannen in her book You just don’t understand
stated that “male-female conversation is cross-cultural communication”
(Griffin, 2009, p.429). She added on that miscommunications occur all the time
between men and women without realising that they are in a cross-cultural
encounter because the effect is rather insidious.
According to
Tannen, she distinguished the women’s need for human connection whilst the men
like independence and would rather compete their way up the hierarchy to claim
a status, “Girls and women feel that it is crucial that they be liked by their
peers, a form of involvement that focuses on symmetrical connection. Boys and
men feel it is crucial that they be respected by their peers, a form of
involvement that focuses on asymmetrical status” (Griffin, 2009, p. 432).
For example:
The above
video shows a short clip taken from A Walk to Remember which supports Tannen
statement of how women seek for connection and men rather keep themselves
unattached.
According to
Tannen, women talk more than men in private conversations and when it comes to
telling a story, women tend to express their desire for community by telling
stories about others or they are the character in their own narrative, these
women rather describe themselves as foolish than smart. Whereas men tend to
tell jokes when they tell a story.
When it
comes to listening, a woman would hold eye contact, nod heads and react with an
uhmm, right or yeah. Whereas for man being concerned with status, such overt style
of listening mean I agree with you. Even
when it comes to asking questions, women do so to establish connection where it’s
their cue of telling that they’re open for a good chat but for men, they’d make
the speaker seem wishy-washy. Men are also more comfortable with conflict and
would less likely hold themselves back.
Reference:
Griffin, E. (2009). A first look at communication theory. (7th ed). New
York: The McGraw-Hill
Companies.
Tiada ulasan:
Catat Ulasan